Contract address as the primary check
Contract address as the primary check is easier to manage when the interface label is separated from the actual on-chain object. In the context of Smart Contract Interaction, review the network, address, contract, request type and expected result rather than relying on a token name, icon or a single status line. Similar-looking addresses and asset symbols can exist on different networks while their states remain independent.
A practical way to work with Contract address as the primary check is to break the action into source, destination, permissions or amount, network state and final outcome. When contract is involved, keep information that can be checked independently, such as a transaction hash, contract address, block status or the selected network. This makes it easier to distinguish a delayed interface from the real on-chain result.
Security remains part of Contract address as the primary check. A legitimate wallet flow does not require you to send a seed phrase, private key or verification code to another person or type those credentials into an unfamiliar website. Treat wallet connection, message signing, transaction signing and token approvals as separate requests, and stop when the domain, contract, allowance or result does not match what you intended.
- Confirm the network, address or contract involved in Contract address as the primary check
- Keep verifiable public information when contract is involved
- Never send a seed phrase, private key or verification code to anyone
Methods and parameters
Methods and parameters is easier to manage when the interface label is separated from the actual on-chain object. In the context of Smart Contract Interaction, review the network, address, contract, request type and expected result rather than relying on a token name, icon or a single status line. Similar-looking addresses and asset symbols can exist on different networks while their states remain independent.
A practical way to work with Methods and parameters is to break the action into source, destination, permissions or amount, network state and final outcome. When method is involved, keep information that can be checked independently, such as a transaction hash, contract address, block status or the selected network. This makes it easier to distinguish a delayed interface from the real on-chain result.
Security remains part of Methods and parameters. A legitimate wallet flow does not require you to send a seed phrase, private key or verification code to another person or type those credentials into an unfamiliar website. Treat wallet connection, message signing, transaction signing and token approvals as separate requests, and stop when the domain, contract, allowance or result does not match what you intended.
- Confirm the network, address or contract involved in Methods and parameters
- Keep verifiable public information when method is involved
- Never send a seed phrase, private key or verification code to anyone
Transaction signing and message signing
Transaction signing and message signing is easier to manage when the interface label is separated from the actual on-chain object. In the context of Smart Contract Interaction, review the network, address, contract, request type and expected result rather than relying on a token name, icon or a single status line. Similar-looking addresses and asset symbols can exist on different networks while their states remain independent.
A practical way to work with Transaction signing and message signing is to break the action into source, destination, permissions or amount, network state and final outcome. When parameter is involved, keep information that can be checked independently, such as a transaction hash, contract address, block status or the selected network. This makes it easier to distinguish a delayed interface from the real on-chain result.
Security remains part of Transaction signing and message signing. A legitimate wallet flow does not require you to send a seed phrase, private key or verification code to another person or type those credentials into an unfamiliar website. Treat wallet connection, message signing, transaction signing and token approvals as separate requests, and stop when the domain, contract, allowance or result does not match what you intended.
- Confirm the network, address or contract involved in Transaction signing and message signing
- Keep verifiable public information when parameter is involved
- Never send a seed phrase, private key or verification code to anyone
Permissions, amounts and outcomes
Permissions, amounts and outcomes is easier to manage when the interface label is separated from the actual on-chain object. In the context of Smart Contract Interaction, review the network, address, contract, request type and expected result rather than relying on a token name, icon or a single status line. Similar-looking addresses and asset symbols can exist on different networks while their states remain independent.
A practical way to work with Permissions, amounts and outcomes is to break the action into source, destination, permissions or amount, network state and final outcome. When signature is involved, keep information that can be checked independently, such as a transaction hash, contract address, block status or the selected network. This makes it easier to distinguish a delayed interface from the real on-chain result.
Security remains part of Permissions, amounts and outcomes. A legitimate wallet flow does not require you to send a seed phrase, private key or verification code to another person or type those credentials into an unfamiliar website. Treat wallet connection, message signing, transaction signing and token approvals as separate requests, and stop when the domain, contract, allowance or result does not match what you intended.
- Confirm the network, address or contract involved in Permissions, amounts and outcomes
- Keep verifiable public information when signature is involved
- Never send a seed phrase, private key or verification code to anyone
Malicious contracts and irreversible risk
Malicious contracts and irreversible risk is easier to manage when the interface label is separated from the actual on-chain object. In the context of Smart Contract Interaction, review the network, address, contract, request type and expected result rather than relying on a token name, icon or a single status line. Similar-looking addresses and asset symbols can exist on different networks while their states remain independent.
A practical way to work with Malicious contracts and irreversible risk is to break the action into source, destination, permissions or amount, network state and final outcome. When risk is involved, keep information that can be checked independently, such as a transaction hash, contract address, block status or the selected network. This makes it easier to distinguish a delayed interface from the real on-chain result.
Security remains part of Malicious contracts and irreversible risk. A legitimate wallet flow does not require you to send a seed phrase, private key or verification code to another person or type those credentials into an unfamiliar website. Treat wallet connection, message signing, transaction signing and token approvals as separate requests, and stop when the domain, contract, allowance or result does not match what you intended.
- Confirm the network, address or contract involved in Malicious contracts and irreversible risk
- Keep verifiable public information when risk is involved
- Never send a seed phrase, private key or verification code to anyone