Displayed balances versus on-chain state
Displayed balances versus on-chain state is easier to manage when the interface label is separated from the actual on-chain object. In the context of Assets & Transactions, review the network, address, contract, request type and expected result rather than relying on a token name, icon or a single status line. Similar-looking addresses and asset symbols can exist on different networks while their states remain independent.
A practical way to work with Displayed balances versus on-chain state is to break the action into source, destination, permissions or amount, network state and final outcome. When token is involved, keep information that can be checked independently, such as a transaction hash, contract address, block status or the selected network. This makes it easier to distinguish a delayed interface from the real on-chain result.
Security remains part of Displayed balances versus on-chain state. A legitimate wallet flow does not require you to send a seed phrase, private key or verification code to another person or type those credentials into an unfamiliar website. Treat wallet connection, message signing, transaction signing and token approvals as separate requests, and stop when the domain, contract, allowance or result does not match what you intended.
- Confirm the network, address or contract involved in Displayed balances versus on-chain state
- Keep verifiable public information when token is involved
- Never send a seed phrase, private key or verification code to anyone
Token contracts and networks
Token contracts and networks is easier to manage when the interface label is separated from the actual on-chain object. In the context of Assets & Transactions, review the network, address, contract, request type and expected result rather than relying on a token name, icon or a single status line. Similar-looking addresses and asset symbols can exist on different networks while their states remain independent.
A practical way to work with Token contracts and networks is to break the action into source, destination, permissions or amount, network state and final outcome. When contract is involved, keep information that can be checked independently, such as a transaction hash, contract address, block status or the selected network. This makes it easier to distinguish a delayed interface from the real on-chain result.
Security remains part of Token contracts and networks. A legitimate wallet flow does not require you to send a seed phrase, private key or verification code to another person or type those credentials into an unfamiliar website. Treat wallet connection, message signing, transaction signing and token approvals as separate requests, and stop when the domain, contract, allowance or result does not match what you intended.
- Confirm the network, address or contract involved in Token contracts and networks
- Keep verifiable public information when contract is involved
- Never send a seed phrase, private key or verification code to anyone
What transaction records contain
What transaction records contain is easier to manage when the interface label is separated from the actual on-chain object. In the context of Assets & Transactions, review the network, address, contract, request type and expected result rather than relying on a token name, icon or a single status line. Similar-looking addresses and asset symbols can exist on different networks while their states remain independent.
A practical way to work with What transaction records contain is to break the action into source, destination, permissions or amount, network state and final outcome. When record is involved, keep information that can be checked independently, such as a transaction hash, contract address, block status or the selected network. This makes it easier to distinguish a delayed interface from the real on-chain result.
Security remains part of What transaction records contain. A legitimate wallet flow does not require you to send a seed phrase, private key or verification code to another person or type those credentials into an unfamiliar website. Treat wallet connection, message signing, transaction signing and token approvals as separate requests, and stop when the domain, contract, allowance or result does not match what you intended.
- Confirm the network, address or contract involved in What transaction records contain
- Keep verifiable public information when record is involved
- Never send a seed phrase, private key or verification code to anyone
Independent checks with block explorers
Independent checks with block explorers is easier to manage when the interface label is separated from the actual on-chain object. In the context of Assets & Transactions, review the network, address, contract, request type and expected result rather than relying on a token name, icon or a single status line. Similar-looking addresses and asset symbols can exist on different networks while their states remain independent.
A practical way to work with Independent checks with block explorers is to break the action into source, destination, permissions or amount, network state and final outcome. When explorer is involved, keep information that can be checked independently, such as a transaction hash, contract address, block status or the selected network. This makes it easier to distinguish a delayed interface from the real on-chain result.
Security remains part of Independent checks with block explorers. A legitimate wallet flow does not require you to send a seed phrase, private key or verification code to another person or type those credentials into an unfamiliar website. Treat wallet connection, message signing, transaction signing and token approvals as separate requests, and stop when the domain, contract, allowance or result does not match what you intended.
- Confirm the network, address or contract involved in Independent checks with block explorers
- Keep verifiable public information when explorer is involved
- Never send a seed phrase, private key or verification code to anyone
Unknown tokens and suspicious assets
Unknown tokens and suspicious assets is easier to manage when the interface label is separated from the actual on-chain object. In the context of Assets & Transactions, review the network, address, contract, request type and expected result rather than relying on a token name, icon or a single status line. Similar-looking addresses and asset symbols can exist on different networks while their states remain independent.
A practical way to work with Unknown tokens and suspicious assets is to break the action into source, destination, permissions or amount, network state and final outcome. When network is involved, keep information that can be checked independently, such as a transaction hash, contract address, block status or the selected network. This makes it easier to distinguish a delayed interface from the real on-chain result.
Security remains part of Unknown tokens and suspicious assets. A legitimate wallet flow does not require you to send a seed phrase, private key or verification code to another person or type those credentials into an unfamiliar website. Treat wallet connection, message signing, transaction signing and token approvals as separate requests, and stop when the domain, contract, allowance or result does not match what you intended.
- Confirm the network, address or contract involved in Unknown tokens and suspicious assets
- Keep verifiable public information when network is involved
- Never send a seed phrase, private key or verification code to anyone